WebDMCA

For sites, hosts & platforms

Safe harbor is a workflow,
not a paragraph in your TOS.

§512 protects providers who process notices properly: intake, validation, takedown, counter-notices, records. We run that machinery under your brand, a /notice/yourname page that only accepts legally complete submissions, with the full workflow behind it.

Unlimited notices on every tier · X-ARF export · API access on Pro.

What the law actually asks

Four duties, one dashboard

1. A designated agent on file

Registered with the Copyright Office and listed in their public directory, the prerequisite everything else depends on. Our guide walks the filing; done once, renewed every three years (or seven under the current rule).

Register your agent

2. A working notice channel

A page and process the public can actually use. Your branded /notice/yourname intake validates §512(c)(3) elements on arrival, incomplete notices get guided to completion instead of dying in a spam folder.

3. Expeditious takedown

Valid notices result in removal or disablement, with the timestamps to prove the speed if safe harbor is ever challenged. Status tracking per notice; nothing lives in one person's inbox.

4. Counter-notice handling

The §512(g) dance is where providers fumble: restore in 10–14 business days if no suit, keep records, don't tip off badly. The workflow is built in, included on every tier, not an upsell.

The counter-notice timeline

Plus the duty nobody reads: a repeat-infringer policy that's actually enforced, the clause that cost Cox Communications its safe harbor in BMG v. Cox.

The machinery

What running notices looks like here

  1. 1

    Your branded intake page goes live

    /notice/yourname, public, linked from your footer, styled to your site. Notices arrive structured, not as freeform emails.

  2. 2

    Validation at the door§512(c)(3)

    §512(c)(3) elements checked on submission: work identification, location, contact, good-faith statements. Invalid notices get guidance; valid ones proceed.

  3. 3

    Processing and tracking

    Forwarding to the right property, takedown actions, per-notice status and timestamps, the expeditious-removal record, generated as you work.

  4. 4

    Counter-notices and exports

    The 10–14 day clock tracked automatically; X-ARF machine-readable export and API access feed your abuse tooling on Pro and above.

Pricing

Unlimited notices on every tier

Basic

1 property

$5/month
  • Branded intake page (/notice/you)
  • §512(c)(3)-validated submissions
  • Notice forwarding + status tracking
  • Counter-notice workflow included
Start Basic
Most chosen

Pro

5 properties

$25/month
  • Everything in Basic
  • X-ARF machine-readable export
  • API access for abuse tooling
Start Pro

ISP

25 properties

$250/month
  • Everything in Pro
  • Priority handling
  • Built for hosts, ISPs & platforms
Start ISP

Half the typical incumbent program price ($10/$50/$250+), with counter-notices and X-ARF included rather than gated.

Compliance FAQ

What operators ask

The problem, precisely

Drowning in dmca@ is a policy risk, not just a chore

Without structure
  • • Invalid or incomplete notices consume staff time before anyone notices they are junk
  • • Response timelines live in email threads, unprovable later
  • • Repeat-infringer decisions rest on memory, not records
  • • Counter-notices cause panic archaeology through inboxes
With the program
  • • Validation at intake: incomplete notices get flagged, not filed
  • • Every action timestamped on the notice record
  • • Repeat-infringer history queryable per sender and per target
  • • Counter-notice workflows with the statutory clock visible

What you get

Six things the program changes on day one

Structured intake, not an inbox

Notices arrive through a validated form, the statutory elements checked on arrival, instead of unparseable email threads your team has to hand-triage.

Counter-notice workflow built in

When a counter-notice lands, the original notice, the timeline, and the response window are in one place. No reconstructing history from forwarded emails.

Per-property quotas and tracking

Every notice is tracked from received to actioned with timestamps, the record that demonstrates a working repeat-infringer policy if you ever need to show one.

X-ARF machine-readable export

Notices export in the X-ARF abuse-reporting format, so security and abuse tooling can consume them without human re-entry.

API access on higher tiers

List notices, update statuses, and automate routing through the same REST API your other tooling uses, signed webhooks included.

Branded to your property

The intake page carries your branding at your URL, not ours, senders see your process, and your legal posture stays yours.

Who it is for

Built for the receiving end of notices

Web hosts and IaaS providers

abuse@ volume is the daily reality; the program turns it into a tracked queue with validation at the door.

Platforms and marketplaces

UGC platforms get structured notices and a repeat-infringer record without building intake tooling.

ISPs and telecoms

Forwarding and tracking obligations, met with a workflow instead of a spreadsheet.

Forums and communities

Volunteer moderation teams get the statutory scaffolding handled; moderators decide, the program documents.

Dating and social sites

Sensitive-content notices need discretion and audit trails; both come standard here.

Agencies running client platforms

Each client property tracked separately, one dashboard, per-property quotas.

Safe harbor is earned in the handling, not claimed in the footer.

Branded intake, statutory validation, tracked workflow, from $5/month.